Brazil's ethanol industry may be closer to a turning point than it appears.
Brazil’s Ethanol Moment
For decades, ethanol has been one of Brazil's greatest energy success stories. Born out of the oil shocks of the 1970s, it evolved from a government initiative into a cornerstone of the country's transportation system. Today, millions of Brazilian drivers choose between gasoline and ethanol every time they fill up, a level of fuel flexibility that remains rare elsewhere in the world. Yet despite its long history and environmental advantages, the ethanol industry is facing one of its most challenging periods in years. The paradox is that the long-term outlook has arguably never looked stronger.
Ethanol in Brazil is a biofuel produced primarily from sugarcane and, increasingly, corn. Sugars and starches are fermented into alcohol and distilled into fuel-grade ethanol, which can either be blended with gasoline or used directly in flex-fuel vehicles. Unlike conventional fossil fuels, ethanol is renewable and generally carries a lower carbon footprint, making it an increasingly important component of the global energy transition.
A tale of two ethanol superpowers: the US and Brazil
Although the United States and Brazil dominate global ethanol production, their markets operate differently. In the US, demand is largely driven by government blending mandates, such as the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), that effectively guarantee consumption. Most drivers have little awareness of how much ethanol is in their fuel.
Brazil's system, in addition to the blending mandate, also has a market-driven component. More than 80% of the country's light-vehicle fleet can run on either gasoline or ethanol, allowing consumers to choose whichever fuel offers better value. Ethanol therefore competes directly with gasoline every day at the pump. This dynamic has historically been a major strength of the industry, but recent events have exposed its vulnerability.
Figure 1: Global ethanol production
Source: EIA, 2024
The oil rally that ethanol missed
When oil prices rise, ethanol typically becomes more competitive. This year, however, that relationship broke down.
As geopolitical tensions pushed oil prices higher, Brazilian government intervened to limit increases in retail fuel prices. The government swiftly passed a provisory measure in May 2026 so gasoline and diesel producers and importers were compensated for the difference,1 helping shield consumers from rising costs. Ethanol producers received no timely support. The result was gasoline prices that remained artificially subdued, preventing ethanol prices from fully participating in the energy rally.
The logic was largely political rather than economic. Gasoline prices feed directly into inflation, transportation costs and voter sentiment, making them a sensitive policy issue, particularly during election periods. Ethanol producers, while important to the energy system, have historically been treated more like agricultural commodity businesses than strategic infrastructure providers. As a result, the sector was left to absorb part of the economic shock while gasoline prices remained below international parity.
That said, the story is turning. While ethanol producers largely missed the benefits of the recent oil rally, Brazil's Senate recently approved a biofuels subsidy framework in mid-August 2026 aimed at better aligning incentives for renewable fuel producers with those available to the fossil fuel value chain.2 The measure reflects growing recognition that prolonged support for gasoline, without corresponding support for biofuels, risks distorting market signals and discouraging investment in a strategically important decarbonisation industry. Although the implementation remains to be seen, the announcement represents one of the first meaningful policy catalysts for the sector in some time and could help narrow the gap between ethanol and gasoline economics going forward.
When success becomes the problem
Government intervention explains part of the industry's difficulties. The other challenge is simpler: Brazil has become exceptionally good at producing ethanol.
Years of investment, particularly in corn ethanol, have pushed supply well ahead of demand. Inventories have risen, margins have contracted, and the sector is experiencing a classic commodity cycle in which capacity arrived before the market was ready to absorb it.
For corn ethanol producers, the pressure has been amplified by rising feedstock costs. Corn prices have moved higher just as ethanol producers so far have struggled to participate in the broader energy rally, squeezing crushing spreads from both sides.
Figure 2: Brazil's ethanol production
Source: Unica, August 2026
Yet the seeds of a recovery may already be emerging. The same sugar market that helped create today's ethanol surplus could help solve it. Weak sugar prices over the past year encouraged sugarcane mills to maximise ethanol production, flooding the market with additional supply. As sugar prices begin to recover, producers are likely to redirect more cane back into sugar, naturally slowing ethanol output growth.
With moderating supply growth, domestic consumption continuing to expand, exports gradually increasing, sugar economics improving, and new biofuel support measures now emerging, ethanol prices and crushing spreads may be approaching a cyclical floor. The industry still faces challenges, but for now, some of the key drivers that created the downturn are beginning to move in the opposite direction.
Three paths through the downturn
This environment is creating clear differentiation among agricultural companies.
The most vulnerable are pure growth stories that rely heavily on debt. These producers continue pursuing aggressive expansion plans despite weak market conditions, betting that future demand will absorb today's surplus. That may ultimately prove correct, but for now they face compressed margins, elevated leverage and delayed free cash flow generation.
At the other end of the spectrum are diversified agricultural businesses. With exposure spanning crops, fertilizers, farmland and sugar processing, these companies can offset ethanol weakness with strength elsewhere. Some can even shift production between sugar and ethanol depending on market conditions, providing valuable flexibility when prices move against them. One such company has benefited significantly from a well-timed acquisition in the fertilizer sector, with its fertilizer earnings more than compensating for weakness in sugar and ethanol markets.
Between these extremes sit large grain merchants that have recently entered the ethanol space. Historically these corporates typically enjoy scale advantages, strong logistics networks and substantial market positions in agricultural exports. For them, adding ethanol to the profile offers attractive long-term exposure to renewable fuels, but it also introduces new risks. Investors who once focused on the stability of their grain-trading franchises must now assess exposure to an industry wrestling with oversupply and rising leverage, while their credit ratings have also come under pressure.
The next demand wave
Despite current challenges, the long-term demand story remains compelling. Countries across Asia are increasing blending mandates, Europe continues to evaluate higher ethanol usage, and new maritime decarbonisation regulations could create an entirely new source of demand. South Korea already demonstrates ethanol's potential beyond transportation, importing substantial volumes from Brazil for petrochemical applications.
Brazil also retains an enduring competitive advantage. Thanks to favourable growing conditions, established infrastructure and decades of operational experience, it remains one of the world's lowest-cost ethanol producers. While the US benefits from stronger policy support, Brazil arguably possesses the more attractive long-term export opportunity.
The real investment question
This leaves Brazil's ethanol industry in an unusual position. The long-term opportunity remains intact, but the near-term economics are challenging. For investors, the debate is no longer whether ethanol demand will grow. It is which corporates have the balance sheet strength, operational flexibility and financial discipline to bridge the gap between today's oversupply and tomorrow's opportunity.
Some of the forces behind the downturn are already beginning to reverse. Sugar prices are improving, biofuel support is strengthening, and global demand continues to build through blending mandates, exports and decarbonisation initiatives. Demand is not the hard part. The timing is. As the cycle begins to turn, the biggest winners may simply be the corporates that could afford to wait.
1. Source: https://news.bloomberglaw.com/international-trade/brazil-govt-publishes-decree-with-gasoline-subsidy
2. Source: https://valorinternational.globo.com/politics/news/2026/08/13/chamber-and-senate-approve-fuel-tax-bill.ghtml
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE
Availability of products and services provided by MacKay Shields may be limited by applicable laws and regulations in certain jurisdictions and this document is provided only for persons to whom this document and the products and services of MacKay Shields may otherwise lawfully be issued or made available. None of the products and services provided by MacKay Shields are offered to any person in any jurisdiction where such offering would be contrary to local law or regulation. This document is provided for information purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice and should not be construed as an offer to buy securities. The contents of this document have not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in any jurisdiction. All investments contain risks and may lose value and these materials do not undertake to explain all of the risks associated with any investment strategy referred to herein. Clients and investors should not invest in any strategy referred to herein unless satisfied that they and/or their representatives have requested and received all information that would enable them to evaluate the merits and risks thereof. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and MacKay Shields assumes no duty and does not undertake to update forward looking statements. Any opinions expressed are the views and opinions of certain investment professionals at MacKay Shields which are subject to change without notice. There may have been, and may in the future be, changes to the investment personnel responsible for the management of the strategy(ies) described herein, as well as changes to the investment process utilized by such investment personnel. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Information included herein should not be considered predicative of future transactions or commitments made by MacKay Shields LLC nor as an indication of current or future profitability. There is no assurance investment objectives will be met.
Past performance is not indicative of future results.
NOTE TO UK AND EUROPEAN UNION AUDIENCE
This document is intended only for the use of professional investors as defined in the Alternative Investment Fund Manager’s Directive and/or the UK Financial Conduct Authority’s Conduct of Business Sourcebook. To the extent this document has been issued in the United Kingdom, it has been issued by NYL Investments UK LLP, 200 Aldersgate Street, London UK EC1A 4HD, which is authorised and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority. To the extent this document has been issued in the EEA, it has been issued by NYL Investments Europe Limited, 77 Sir John Rogerson's Quay, Block C Dublin D02 VK60 Ireland. NYL Investments Europe Limited is authorized and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland (i) to act as an alternative investment fund manager of alternative investment funds under the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (Directive 2011/61/EU) and (ii) to provide the services of individual portfolio management, investment advice and the receipt and transmission of orders as defined in Regulation 7(4) of the AIFMD Regulations to persons who meet the definition of “professional client” as set out in the MiFID Regulations. It has passported its license in additional countries in the EEA.
This document only describes capabilities of certain affiliates of New York Life Investment Management and/or MacKay Shields LLC. No such affiliates will accept subscriptions in any funds not admitted to marketing in your country or provide services to potential customers in your country, including discretionary asset management services, except where it is licensed to do so or can rely on an applicable exemption.
MacKay Shields LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of New York Life Investment Management Holdings LLC, which is wholly owned by New York Life Insurance Company. "New York Life Investment Management" is both a service mark, and the common trade name of certain investment advisers affiliated with New York Life Insurance Company. Investments are not guaranteed by New York Life Insurance Company or New York Life Investment Management.
NOTE TO CANADIAN RECIPIENTS
The information in these materials is not an offer to sell securities or a solicitation of an offer to buy securities in any jurisdiction of Canada. In Canada, any offer or sale of securities or the provision of any advisory or investment fund manager services will be made only in accordance with applicable Canadian securities laws. More specifically, any offer or sale of securities will be made in accordance with applicable exemptions to dealer and investment fund manager registration requirements, as well as under an exemption from the requirement to file a prospectus, and any advice given on securities will be made in reliance on applicable exemptions to adviser registration requirements.
Information included herein should not be considered predicative of future transactions or commitments made by MacKay Shields LLC nor as an indication of current or future profitability. There is no assurance investment objectives will be met. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
NOTE TO JAPANESE RECIPIENTS
In Japan, this is issued by New York Life Investment Management Asia Limited (Financial Instruments Business Operator, Kanto Local Finance Bureau (FIBO) No. 2964, Member of the Investment Management Association of Japan and the Type 2 Financial Instruments Firms Association) for institutional investors only. As costs and/or fees to be borne by investors vary depending on circumstances such as products, services, investment period and market conditions, the total amount nor the calculation methods cannot be disclosed in advance. All investments involve risks, including market fluctuation and investors may lose the principal amount invested. Investors should obtain and read the prospectus and/or information set forth in Article 37-3 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act carefully before making investment decisions. MacKay Shields LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of New York Life Investment Management Holdings LLC, which is wholly owned by New York Life Insurance Company. "New York Life Investments" is both a service mark, and the common trade name of certain investment advisers affiliated with New York Life Insurance Company. Investments are not guaranteed by New York Life Insurance Company or New York Life Investments.
SOURCE INFORMATION
“Bloomberg®”, “Bloomberg Indices®”, Bloomberg Fixed Income Indices, Bloomberg Equity Indices and all other Bloomberg indices referenced herein are service marks of Bloomberg Finance L.P. and its affiliates, including Bloomberg Index Services Limited (“BISL”), the administrator of the indices (collectively, “Bloomberg”) and have been licensed for use for certain purposes by MacKay Shields LLC (“MacKay Shields”). Bloomberg is not affiliated with MacKay Shields, and Bloomberg does not approve, endorse, review, or recommend MacKay Shields or any products, funds or services described herein. Bloomberg does not guarantee the timeliness, accurateness, or completeness of any data or information relating to MacKay Shields or any products, funds or services described herein.
Subscribe to get MacKay Shields insights delivered to your inbox.
Related Thought Leadership